Coral skeletons provide historical evidence of phosphorus runoff on the great barrier reef

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 27;8(9):e75663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075663. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Recently, the inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef have declined rapidly because of deteriorating water quality. Increased catchment runoff is one potential culprit. The impacts of land-use on coral growth and reef health however are largely circumstantial due to limited long-term data on water quality and reef health. Here we use a 60 year coral core record to show that phosphorus contained in the skeletons (P/Ca) of long-lived, near-shore Porites corals on the Great Barrier Reef correlates with annual records of fertiliser application and particulate phosphorus loads in the adjacent catchment. Skeletal P/Ca also correlates with Ba/Ca, a proxy for fluvial sediment loading, again linking near-shore phosphorus records with river runoff. Coral core records suggest that phosphorus levels increased 8 fold between 1949 and 2008 with the greatest levels coinciding with periods of high fertiliser-phosphorus use. Periods of high P/Ca correspond with intense agricultural activity and increased fertiliser application in the river catchment following agricultural expansion and replanting after cyclone damage. Our results demonstrate how coral P/Ca records can be used to assess terrestrial nutrient loading of vulnerable near-shore reefs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anthozoa / metabolism*
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Geologic Sediments / chemistry
  • Phosphorus / metabolism*
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / chemistry
  • Water Quality

Substances

  • Water Pollutants, Chemical
  • Phosphorus

Grants and funding

Funding for this work was provided by: 1) The Marine and Tropical Science Facility (MTSRF) awarded to JM & SL:Project 3.7.2 Connectivity and risk: tracing materials from the upper catchment to the Reef, and 2) ARC DECRA awarded to JM: http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/decra.htm. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.