Assessing the validity and reproducibility of genome-scale predictions

Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 15;29(22):2844-51. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt508. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

Abstract

Motivation: Validation and reproducibility of results is a central and pressing issue in genomics. Several recent embarrassing incidents involving the irreproducibility of high-profile studies have illustrated the importance of this issue and the need for rigorous methods for the assessment of reproducibility.

Results: Here, we describe an existing statistical model that is very well suited to this problem. We explain its utility for assessing the reproducibility of validation experiments, and apply it to a genome-scale study of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-mediated RNA editing in Drosophila. We also introduce a statistical method for planning validation experiments that will obtain the tightest reproducibility confidence limits, which, for a fixed total number of experiments, returns the optimal number of replicates for the study.

Availability: Downloadable software and a web service for both the analysis of data from a reproducibility study and for the optimal design of these studies is provided at http://ccmbweb.ccv.brown.edu/reproducibility.html .

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adenosine Deaminase
  • Animals
  • Drosophila / genetics
  • Genome
  • Genomics / methods*
  • Models, Statistical*
  • RNA Editing
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Software

Substances

  • Adenosine Deaminase