The relationship between electrospray ionization behavior and cytotoxic activity of [M(I)(P)4](+)-type complexes (M = Cu, Ag and Au; P = tertiary phosphine)

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2013 Sep 15;27(17):2019-27. doi: 10.1002/rcm.6661.

Abstract

Rationale: To try to find a correlation between the antiproliferative activity of a series of [M(I)(P)4](+) complexes (M = Cu, Ag and Au; P = tertiary phosphine) and their stability at micromolar concentration under mass spectrometric conditions.

Methods: [M(I)(P)4](+) complexes were investigated by positive ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with multiple collisional experiments using an ion trap mass spectrometer.

Results: The displacement of P from native [M(I)(P)4](+), previously described for the copper derivative, is common for the triad complexes leading to the formation of [M(P)3](+) and [M(P)2](+) adducts. Further dissociation of [M(P)2](+) depends on the nature of the metal (Cu ~ Ag > Au). More labile [Cu(P)2](+) and [Ag(P)2](+) are more cytotoxic against HCT-15 human colon carcinoma cells compared to less labile [Au(P)2](+) species.

Conclusions: The dissociation of P ligand(s) from the [M(I)(P)4](+) complexes is the driving force for the triggering of the antiproliferative activity. The more favored is the displacement of P from the [M(P)2](+) active form, the more favored is in turn the possibility for the metal to interact with biological substrates related to cancer proliferation.

MeSH terms

  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Proliferation / drug effects
  • Copper / chemistry*
  • Copper / toxicity
  • Gold / chemistry*
  • Gold / toxicity
  • Humans
  • Phosphines / chemistry*
  • Phosphines / toxicity*
  • Silver / chemistry*
  • Silver / toxicity
  • Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization
  • Structure-Activity Relationship

Substances

  • Phosphines
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Copper
  • phosphine