Biomass and its allocation in relation to temperature, precipitation, and soil nutrients in Inner Mongolia grasslands, China

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 25;8(7):e69561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069561. Print 2013.

Abstract

Aim: Understanding and predicting ecosystem functioning such as biomass accumulation requires an accurate assessment of large-scale patterns of biomass distribution and partitioning in relation to climatic and soil environments.

Methods: We sampled above- and belowground biomass from 26 sites spanning 1500 km in Inner Mongolian grasslands, compared the difference in aboveground, belowground biomass and below-aboveground biomass ratio (AGB, BGB, and B/A, respectively) among meadow steppe, typical steppe, and desert steppe types. The relationships between AGB, BGB, B/A and climatic and soil environments were then examined.

Results: We found that AGB and BGB differed significantly among three types of grasslands while B/A did not differ. Structural equation model analyses indicated that mean annual precipitation was the strongest positive driver for AGB and BGB. AGB was also positively associated with soil organic carbon, whereas B/A was positively associated with total soil nitrogen.

Conclusions: These results indicated that precipitation positively influence plant production in Inner Mongolian grasslands. Contrary to the prediction from the optimal partitioning hypothesis, biomass allocation to belowground increased with soil total nitrogen, suggesting that more productive sites may increase belowground allocation as an adaptive strategy to potentially high fire frequencies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomass*
  • China
  • Climate
  • Ecosystem
  • Models, Statistical
  • Plant Roots / physiology*
  • Poaceae / physiology*
  • Rain*
  • Soil / chemistry*
  • Temperature
  • Water

Substances

  • Soil
  • Water

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the Project (2008-KF-03) funded by the State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, the National Science Foundation of China (number 41271059), and Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (DG 283336-09). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.