A feasible modified biopsy method for tissue diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4752-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4752.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of a modified technique for the histological diagnosis of subepithelial tumors (SETs).

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent a modified technique for the histological diagnosis of gastric SETs, consisting of a mucosal incision with a fixed flexible snare (MIF) and deep-tissue biopsy under conventional endoscopic view, from January 2012 to January 2013 was performed. Eleven patients with gastric SETs 10-30 mm in diameter and originating from the third or fourth layer on endoscopic ultrasonography were included.

Results: The mean age was 59.8 (range, 45-76) years, and 5 patients were male. The mean size of the SETs was 21.8 (range, 11-30) mm. The number of biopsy specimens was 6.3 (range 5-8). The mean procedure time was 9.0 min (range, 4-17 min). The diagnostic yield of MIF biopsies was 90.9% (10/11). The histological diagnoses were leiomyoma (4/11, 36.4%), aberrant pancreas (3/11, 27.3%), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (2/11, 18.2%), an inflammatory fibrinoid tumor (1/11, 9.1%); one result was non-diagnostic (1/11, 9.1%). There were six mesenchymal tumors; the specimens obtained in each case were sufficient for an immunohistochemical diagnosis. There was no major bleeding, but one perforation occurred that was successfully controlled by endoscopic clipping.

Conclusion: The MIF biopsy was simple to perform, safe, and required a shorter procedure time, with a high diagnostic yield for small SETs.

Keywords: Biopsy; Diagnostic techniques; Endoscopy; Stomach; Subepithelial tumors.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Endosonography
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Gastric Mucosa / pathology*
  • Gastroscopy* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / adverse effects
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Time Factors
  • Tumor Burden