Assessment of Caspian Seal By-Catch in an Illegal Fishery Using an Interview-Based Approach

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e67074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067074. Print 2013.

Abstract

The Caspian seal (Pusa caspica) has declined by more than 90% since 1900 and is listed as endangered by IUCN. We made the first quantitative assessment of Caspian seal by-catch mortality in fisheries in the north Caspian Sea by conducting semi-structured interviews in fishing communities along the coasts of Russia (Kalmykia, Dagestan), Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. We recorded a documented minimum by-catch of 1,215 seals in the survey sample, for the 2008-2009 fishing season, 93% of which occurred in illegal sturgeon fisheries. Due to the illegal nature of the fishery, accurately quantifying total fishing effort is problematic and the survey sample could reflect less than 10% of poaching activity in the north Caspian Sea. Therefore total annual by-catch may be significantly greater than the minimum documented by the survey. The presence of high by-catch rates was supported independently by evidence of net entanglement from seal carcasses, during a mass stranding on the Kazakh coast in May 2009, where 30 of 312 carcasses were entangled in large mesh sturgeon net remnants. The documented minimum by-catch may account for 5 to 19% of annual pup production. Sturgeon poaching therefore not only represents a serious threat to Caspian sturgeon populations, but may also be having broader impacts on the Caspian Sea ecosystem by contributing to a decline in one of the ecosystem's key predators. This study demonstrates the utility of interview-based approaches in providing rapid assessments of by-catch in illegal small-scale fisheries, which are not amenable to study by other methods.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Fisheries / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Fisheries / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic*
  • Seals, Earless*
  • Seasons

Grants and funding

This study was supported by Darwin Initiative grant 162-15-24, from the United Kingdom government’s Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.