Electrophysiology procedures: weighing the factors affecting choice of anesthesia

Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Sep;17(3):203-11. doi: 10.1177/1089253213494023. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

Abstract

Invasive electrophysiologic procedures have evolved and increased in frequency significantly over the past 2 decades. The complexity and nature of the various procedures offered have also changed, and complex ablations for atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia have become commonplace. These procedures often require the services of an anesthesiologist. An understanding of the specific nature and challenges of these procedures may be helpful in planning the optimal anesthetic and patient management. A paired review of these issues has been written from the standpoint of a practicing anesthesiologist. This review is written from the viewpoint of a cardiac electrophysiologist and will focus on the intra-procedural management of patients undergoing both cardiac implantable device implantation as well as catheter-based ablations, with a specific focus on the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ultimately, the proper management of these patients will facilitate successful procedural outcomes while maintaining a high degree of patient safety.

Keywords: cardiac anesthesia; cardiac surgery; heart; heart failure; intraoperative assessment; monitoring; postoperative complications.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia / methods*
  • Body Surface Potential Mapping
  • Catheter Ablation / adverse effects
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac / methods*
  • Humans
  • Tachycardia, Supraventricular / surgery
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular / surgery