DNA Methylation Alterations at 5'-CCGG Sites in the Interspecific and Intraspecific Hybridizations Derived from Brassica rapa and B. napus

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e65946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065946. Print 2013.

Abstract

DNA methylation is an important regulatory mechanism for gene expression that involved in the biological processes of development and differentiation in plants. To investigate the association of DNA methylation with heterosis in Brassica, a set of intraspecific hybrids in Brassica rapa and B. napus and interspecific hybrids between B. rapa and B. napus, together with parental lines, were used to monitor alterations in cytosine methylation at 5'-CCGG sites in seedlings and buds by methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism analysis. The methylation status of approximately a quarter of the methylation sites changed between seedlings and buds. These alterations were related closely to the genomic structure and heterozygous status among accessions. The methylation status in the majority of DNA methylation sites detected in hybrids was the same as that in at least one of the parental lines in both seedlings and buds. However, the association between patterns of cytosine methylation and heterosis varied among different traits and between tissues in hybrids of Brassica, although a few methylation loci were associated with heterosis. Our data suggest that changes in DNA methylation at 5'-CCGG sites are not associated simply with heterosis in the interspecific and intraspecific hybridizations derived from B. rapa and B. napus.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Brassica napus / genetics*
  • Brassica rapa / genetics*
  • Cytosine / metabolism
  • DNA Methylation*
  • Hybridization, Genetic*

Substances

  • Cytosine

Grants and funding

This work was supported financially by grants from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171585), CSTC 201180001, and 111 Project 13 (B12006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.