[Indirect comparison of different adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II-III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy in Asian patients]

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;16(6):534-7.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for stage II-III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy in Asian patients.

Methods: Associated literatures were searched through electronic databases and hand-searching. Prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy with surgery alone were included in the study. Overall survival and disease-free survival were chosen as the endpoints. Relative hazard was analyzed by Bucher adjusted indirect comparison.

Results: Two RCTs were selected, including comparison between S-1 versus surgery alone and comparison between XELOX versus surgery alone. There was no statistical difference in overall survival between the two regimens (HR=0.94, 95%CI:0.62-1.44, P=0.79). The recurrence risk of S-1 was slightly higher as compared to XELOX, but no statistical difference was found (HR=1.11, 95%CI:0.80-1.53, P=0.54).

Conclusion: The adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is similar to XELOX for stage II-III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy in Asian patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Capecitabine
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant*
  • Deoxycytidine / analogs & derivatives
  • Fluorouracil / analogs & derivatives
  • Humans
  • Oxaloacetates
  • Postoperative Care
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Oxaloacetates
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Capecitabine
  • Fluorouracil

Supplementary concepts

  • XELOX