A review of the performance of artifact filtering algorithms for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

J Healthc Eng. 2013;4(2):185-202. doi: 10.1260/2040-2295.4.2.185.

Abstract

Various filtering strategies have been adopted and investigated to suppress the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) artifact. In this article, two types of artifact removal methods are reviewed: one is the method that removes CPR artifact using only ECG signals, and the other is the method with additional reference signals, such as acceleration, compression depth and transthoracic impedance. After filtering, the signal-to-noise ratio is improved from 0 dB to greater than 2.8 dB, the sensitivity is increased to > 90% as recommended by the American Heart Association, whereas the specificity was far from the recommended 95%, which is considered to be the major drawback of the available artifact removal methods. The overall performance of the adaptive filtering methods with additional reference signal outperforms the methods using only ECG signals. Further research should focus on the refinement of artifact filtering methods and the improvement of shock advice algorithms with the presence of CPR.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Artifacts*
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Electrocardiography / methods*
  • Heart Arrest / diagnosis*
  • Heart Arrest / epidemiology
  • Heart Arrest / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted*