Anal transitional zone neoplasia in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA: incidence, management, and oncologic and functional outcomes

Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jul;56(7):808-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829005db.

Abstract

Background: Restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis may leave residual anal transitional zone mucosa that is prone to neoplasia.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term control of neoplasia at the IPAA, the functional outcomes, and the influence of anastomotic technique on these results.

Design: : This research is a retrospective cohort study from a prospective database.

Setting: The investigation took place in a high-volume specialized colorectal surgery department.

Patients: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent IPAA between 1983 and 2010 were included.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes measured were functional outcomes, quality of life, and the incidence of neoplasia in the anal transitional zone.

Results: Eighty-six patients underwent mucosectomy and 174 underwent stapled anastomosis with mean 155 ± 99 and 95 ± 70 months follow-up. Eighteen patients (20.9%) in the mucosectomy group and 59 patients (33.9%) in the stapled group developed anal transitional zone adenomas (p = 0.03). One of 86 (1.2%) patients undergoing mucosectomy and 3 of 174 (1.7%) patients undergoing stapled anastomosis developed cancer in the anal transitional zone (p > 0.05). Three of these patients underwent an abdominoperineal resection, but one who refused abdominoperineal resection underwent transanal excision with neoileoanal anastomosis. Patients undergoing a mucosectomy had a significantly higher rate of anastomotic stricture, but other complications were similar. Incontinence, seepage, and pad usage were higher in the mucosectomy group. Cleveland global quality-of-life score was 0.8 ± 0.2 in patients with handsewn anastomoses and 0.8 ± 0.3 in patients with a stapled anastomoses (p > 0.05).

Limitations: This study was limited by its nonrandomized retrospective design.

Conclusions: Risk for the development of adenomas in the anal transitional zone is higher after a stapled IPAA than after a mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis. However, control of anal transitional zone neoplasia results in a similar risk of cancer development. Because the stapled procedure is associated with better long-term functional outcomes than a mucosectomy, stapled IPAA is the preferable procedure for most patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / pathology
  • Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Anus Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Anus Neoplasms / etiology
  • Anus Neoplasms / surgery
  • Colon / pathology
  • Colon / physiopathology
  • Colon / surgery
  • Colonoscopy
  • Defecation
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Intestinal Mucosa / pathology
  • Intestinal Mucosa / surgery
  • Male
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary / epidemiology*
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary / etiology
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary / surgery
  • Ohio / epidemiology
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative*
  • Quality of Life
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Suture Techniques / adverse effects*
  • Suture Techniques / instrumentation
  • Sutures / adverse effects*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome