Ecological drivers of biogeographic patterns of soil archaeal community

PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063375. Print 2013.

Abstract

Knowledge about the biogeography of organisms has long been a focus in ecological research, including the mechanisms that generate and maintain diversity. In this study, we targeted a microbial group relatively underrepresented in the microbial biogeographic literature, the soil Archaea. We surveyed the archaeal abundance and community composition using real-time quantitative PCR and T-RFLP approaches for 105 soil samples from 2 habitat types to identify the archaeal distribution patterns and factors driving these patterns. Results showed that the soil archaeal community was affected by spatial and environmental variables, and 79% and 51% of the community variation was explained in the non-flooded soil (NS) and flooded soil (FS) habitat, respectively, showing its possible biogeographic distribution. The diversity patterns of soil Archaea across the landscape were influenced by a combination of stochastic and deterministic processes. The contribution from neutral processes was higher than that from deterministic processes associated with environmental variables. The variables pH, sample depth and longitude played key roles in determining the archaeal distribution in the NS habitat, while sampling depth, longitude and NH4 (+)-N were most important in the FS habitat. Overall, there might be similar ecological drivers in the soil archaeal community as in macroorganism communities.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Archaea / genetics*
  • Archaea / physiology*
  • Biota / genetics*
  • Biota / physiology*
  • Ecology*
  • Ecosystem
  • Environment
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Soil
  • Soil Microbiology*

Substances

  • Soil

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41230857 and 41025004) and the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams of “Ecosystem Processes and Services”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.