Outcomes after elective aortic aneurysm repair: a nationwide Danish cohort study 2007-2010

Abstract

Objective: To assess outcomes after treatment for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Denmark in a period when both open surgery (OR) and endoluminal repair (EVAR) have been routine procedures.

Methods: We performed a retrospective nationwide cohort study of patients treated for asymptomatic AAA between 2007 and 2010. Data on demographics, procedural data, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), 30-day reinterventions and readmissions, late aneurysm and procedure-related complications and mortality were obtained from the Danish Vascular Registry and the Danish National Patient Register.

Results: 525 EVAR and 1176 OR for asymptomatic AAA were identified. LOS was shorter after EVAR than OR (4 vs. 7 days, p < .001). During primary hospitalization procedure-related complications (12% vs. 6%) and general complications (21% vs. 8%) were more common after OR than EVAR (p < 0.001). The 30-day reintervention rate was higher for OR than EVAR (18% vs. 6%, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in readmissions within 30 days. During follow-up (mean 29 ± 15 months) aneurysm-related complications after EVAR were outweighed by procedure-related complications after OR.

Conclusion: Elective AAA repair in Denmark is overall comparable with international results and both perioperative and late outcomes after EVAR of elective AAA are better than the results after OR.