Is computed tomography volumetric assessment of the liver reliable in patients with cirrhosis?

HPB (Oxford). 2014 Feb;16(2):188-94. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12110. Epub 2013 May 17.

Abstract

Objectives: The estimation of liver volume (LV) has been widely studied in normal liver, the density of which is considered to be equivalent to 1 kg/l. In cirrhosis, volumetric evaluation and its correlation to liver mass remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scanning to assess LV in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: Liver volume was evaluated by CT (CTLV) and correlated to the explanted liver weight (LW) in 49 patients. Liver density (LD) and its association with clinical features were analysed. Commonly used formulae for estimating LV were also evaluated. The real density of cirrhotic liver was prospectively measured in explant specimens.

Results: Wide variations between CTLV (in ml) and LW (in g) were found (range: 3-748). Cirrhotic livers in patients with hepatitis B virus infection presented significantly increased LD (P = 0.001) with lower CTLV (P = 0.005). Liver volume as measured by CT was also decreased in patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of >15 (P = 0.023). Formulae estimating LV correlated poorly with CTLV and LW. The density of cirrhotic liver measured prospectively in 15 patients was 1.1 kg/l.

Conclusions: In cirrhotic liver, LV assessed by CT did not correspond to real LW. Liver density changed according to the aetiology and severity of liver disease. Commonly used formulae did not accurately assess LV.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Cirrhosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Liver Cirrhosis / etiology
  • Liver Cirrhosis / pathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organ Size*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*