Similar local and landscape processes affect both a common and a rare newt species

PLoS One. 2013 May 3;8(5):e62727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062727. Print 2013.

Abstract

Although rare species are often the focus of conservation measures, more common species may experience similar decline and suffer from the same threatening processes. We tested this hypothesis by examining, through an information-theoretic approach, the importance of ecological processes at multiple scales in the great crested newt Triturus cristatus, regionally endangered and protected in Europe, and the more common smooth newt, Lissotriton vulgaris. Both species were similarly affected by the same processes, i.e. suitability of aquatic and terrestrial components of their habitat at different scales, connectivity among breeding sites, and the presence of introduced fish. T. cristatus depended more on water depth and aquatic vegetation than L. vulgaris. The results show that environmental pressures threaten both common and rare species, and therefore the more widespread species should not be neglected in conservation programs. Because environmental trends are leading to a deterioration of aquatic and terrestrial habitat features required by newt populations, populations of the common species may follow the fate of the rarest species. This could have substantial conservation implications because of the numerical importance of common species in ecosystems and because commonness could be a transient state moving towards rarity. On the other hand, in agreement with the umbrella species concept, targeting conservation efforts on the most demanding species would also protect part of the populations of the most common species.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Ecosystem
  • Endangered Species / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Endangered Species / trends*
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Male
  • Ponds
  • Salamandridae / physiology*
  • Species Specificity

Grants and funding

MD is a Research Associate at the F.R.S. – Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium). GFF was funded by a scholarship of the University of Milano-Bicocca. This research benefited from a public grant of Service Public de Wallonie, Contrat de rivière du sous-bassin hydrographique de la Vesdre, F.R.S. – FNRS (Crédit au chercheur 1.5.040.10) and Fonds Spéciaux pour la Recherche (C11/23 - University of Liège). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.