Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of heterogeneity

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 4;8(4):e60421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060421. Print 2013.

Abstract

Background: Fluorescence-based methods have been proposed to aid caries lesion detection. Summarizing and analysing findings of studies about fluorescence-based methods could clarify their real benefits.

Objective: We aimed to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of fluorescence-based methods in detecting caries lesions.

Data source: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus through June 2012 to identify papers/articles published. Other sources were checked to identify non-published literature. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND DIAGNOSTIC METHODS: The eligibility criteria were studies that: (1) have assessed the accuracy of fluorescence-based methods of detecting caries lesions on occlusal, approximal or smooth surfaces, in both primary or permanent human teeth, in the laboratory or clinical setting; (2) have used a reference standard; and (3) have reported sufficient data relating to the sample size and the accuracy of methods.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: A diagnostic 2×2 table was extracted from included studies to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy parameters (Diagnostic Odds Ratio and Summary Receiver-Operating curve). The analyses were performed separately for each method and different characteristics of the studies. The quality of the studies and heterogeneity were also evaluated.

Results: Seventy five studies met the inclusion criteria from the 434 articles initially identified. The search of the grey or non-published literature did not identify any further studies. In general, the analysis demonstrated that the fluorescence-based method tend to have similar accuracy for all types of teeth, dental surfaces or settings. There was a trend of better performance of fluorescence methods in detecting more advanced caries lesions. We also observed moderate to high heterogeneity and evidenced publication bias.

Conclusions: Fluorescence-based devices have similar overall performance; however, better accuracy in detecting more advanced caries lesions has been observed.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Dental Caries / diagnosis*
  • Fluorescence*
  • Humans
  • Luminescent Measurements* / methods
  • Publication Bias
  • ROC Curve
  • Reproducibility of Results

Grants and funding

This study was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). FMM is recipient of the Research Productivity Scholarship – CNPq. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.