Black box integration of computer-aided diagnosis into PACS deserves a second chance: results of a usability study concerning bone age assessment

J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug;26(4):698-708. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9590-y.

Abstract

Usability aspects of different integration concepts for picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) were inquired on the example of BoneXpert, a program determining the skeletal age from a left hand's radiograph. CAD-PACS integration was assessed according to its levels: data, function, presentation, and context integration focusing on usability aspects. A user-based study design was selected. Statements of seven experienced radiologists using two alternative types of integration provided by BoneXpert were acquired and analyzed using a mixed-methods approach based on think-aloud records and a questionnaire. In both variants, the CAD module (BoneXpert) was easily integrated in the workflow, found comprehensible and fitting in the conceptual framework of the radiologists. Weak points of the software integration referred to data and context integration. Surprisingly, visualization of intermediate image processing states (presentation integration) was found less important as compared to efficient handling and fast computation. Seamlessly integrating CAD into the PACS without additional work steps or unnecessary interrupts and without visualizing intermediate images may considerably improve software performance and user acceptance with efforts in time.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Age Determination by Skeleton / methods*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Female
  • Germany
  • Hand / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Male
  • Observer Variation
  • Radiology Information Systems*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Software
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Systems Integration*