Contact sensitization to modern wound dressings in 70 patients with chronic leg ulcers

Dermatitis. 2013 Mar-Apr;24(2):60-3. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e318284d9f2.

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic leg ulcers typically experience contact allergy to topical treatments. Although declared as hypoallergenic, modern wound dressings have caused several reported cases of contact allergy.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate any allergenic potential of modern wound dressings in patients with leg ulcers.

Methods: Seventy-one patients were included in our prospective observation. Patch tests were performed with a selection of 10 modern wound dressings and with selected allergens according to series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).

Results: Of 70 patients eligible for evaluation, 12 (17%) were positive for the hydrogel NuGel, followed by the hydrocolloid NuDerm (n = 7/70, 10%) and the ionic silver-containing wound dressing Aquacel Ag and the gauze Adaptic (both n = 4/70, 5%). Patients with recalcitrant ulcers of prolonged duration showed a significant higher number of epicutaneous sensitizations to wound dressings than patients with shorter ulcer duration.

Conclusions: The allergenic potential of modern wound dressings should not be underestimated. There is need for precise declaration of all ingredients.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Allergens / adverse effects*
  • Bandages / adverse effects*
  • Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium / adverse effects
  • Colloids / adverse effects
  • Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / etiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leg Ulcer / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patch Tests / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Silver Compounds / adverse effects
  • Wound Healing*

Substances

  • Allergens
  • Colloids
  • Silver Compounds
  • Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium