Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for acute stroke

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28:(2):CD009622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009622.pub2.

Abstract

Background: Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists have been shown to have a neuroprotectant effect in reducing infarct size and improving functional outcome in animal models of cerebral ischemia. However, the sedation effects of GABA receptor agonists have limited their wider application in acute stroke patients due to the potential risk of stupor.

Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of GABA receptor agonists in the treatment of acute stroke.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (January 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1949 to March 2012), EMBASE (1980 to March 2012), CINAHL (1982 to March 2012), AMED (1985 to March 2012) and 11 Chinese databases (March 2012). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating GABA receptor agonists versus placebo for acute stroke patients (within 12 hours after stroke onset), with the outcomes of death or dependency, functional independence and adverse events.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted eligible data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality.

Main results: We included five trials with 3838 patients. The methodological quality of the included trials was generally good, with low risk of bias. Four trials measured death and dependency at three months in chlormethiazole versus placebo without significant difference (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.11). One trial measured this outcome between diazepam and placebo (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07). In the subgroup analysis of total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS), a higher percentage of functional independence was found in the chlormethiazole group (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64). The frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole were somnolence (RR 4.56, 95% CI 3.50 to 5.95) and rhinitis (RR 4.75, 95% CI 2.67 to 8.46).

Authors' conclusions: This review does not provide the evidence to support the use of GABA receptor agonists (chlormethiazole or diazepam) for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Chlormethiazole appeared to be beneficial in improving functional independence in patients with TACS according to the subgroup analysis, but this result must be interpreted with great caution. More well-designed RCTs with large samples of TACS would be required for further confirmation. However, somnolence and rhinitis are frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Chlormethiazole / adverse effects
  • Chlormethiazole / therapeutic use*
  • Diazepam / therapeutic use*
  • GABA Agonists / adverse effects
  • GABA Agonists / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Neuroprotective Agents / adverse effects
  • Neuroprotective Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stroke / drug therapy*

Substances

  • GABA Agonists
  • Neuroprotective Agents
  • Chlormethiazole
  • Diazepam