Introduction: We describe the clinical and sociodemographic features at baseline of a cohort of bipolar patients included in a prospective study.
Methods: A total of 296 consecutive outpatients with bipolar disorder were recruited. Diagnosis relied on clinical judgment according to DSM-IV-TR criteria and the semi-structured MINI Interview. Retrospective data on the course of the disease and cross-sectional data on social adaptation (Social Adaptation Adjustment Self-Assessment Scale (SASS) and affective symptoms were collected. Affective symptomatology (euthymia, subsyndromal symptoms and episodes) was studied according to clinical criteria and the Hamilton Depression and Young rating scales. Differences between type I and II bipolar patients and between men and women were analyzed.
Results: The mean age was 48.8 years (95% CI 47.2-50.4); 56.8% were women and 43.2% were men. A total of 65.2% had a diagnosis of type I bipolar disorder and 23.3% of type II; 49.8% of the sample were euthymic, 32.7% had subsyndromal symptoms and 17.5% had had an affective episode. Diagnostic delay was 9.3 years (95% CI 8.2-10.3). In patients with type II bipolar disorder, the mean age (54.4 years; 95% CI 50.9-57.9 vs. 47.7 years; 95% CI 45.8-49.7, p=0.007), age at onset of illness (35.7 years; 95% CI 31.8-39.7 vs. 29.8 years; 95% CI 28-31.6, p=0.008) and age at diagnosis (47.7 years; 95% CI 44-51.3 vs. 37.9; 95% CI 35.9-39.8, p<0.0001) were higher than in patients with type I bipolar disorder. Manic polarity in the initial episode and psychotic episodes were more frequent in men, while depressive episodes and hypothyroidism were more frequent in women.
Conclusions: Our results confirm data published in our environment on sociodemographic and clinical variables but diagnostic delay in our study was longer. Compared with American samples, age at onset and at diagnosis were higher in our sample but comorbidity was much lower.
Copyright © 2010 SEP y SEPB. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.