Comparison between two generic questionnaires to assess satisfaction with medication in chronic diseases

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056247. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this work was to compare two generic questionnaires assessing patients' satisfaction with medication. In addition we tested whether satisfaction can predict adherence to medication regimens in patients with chronic diseases, and which dimensions of satisfaction are most involved.

Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted over one year in a heterogeneous population of patients with various chronic diseases. Satisfaction with medication was assessed by using the TSQM® vII and the SatMed-Q® questionnaires, and adherence to treatment was assessed with the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Clinical pharmacists interviewed patients to collect clinical, demographic and therapeutic data.

Results: 190 patients were enrolled. Both questionnaires showed excellent reliability and correlation was high (R=0.70; p<0.001). Adherence was correlated with satisfaction with medication whether assessed with the SatMed-Q® (R=0.23; p=0.002) or the TSQM® (R=0.17; p=0.02). Among different dimensions of satisfaction, convenience of use and side effects are prominent predictors of adherence.

Conclusion: Adherence is related to the patient's satisfaction with medication whether assessed with the TSQM® vII or the SatMed-Q®. Therefore, these simple questionnaires could be used as predictive tools to identify patients whos' adherence needs to be improved.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chronic Disease / drug therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Quality of Life
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*

Grants and funding

The investigators received research grants from Grenoble University Hospital; Pfizer; and Abbott to finance the linguistic validation of the SatMed-Q(r) and study conduction. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.