[Criteria for socket type prescription: indications and contraindications of a liner system]

Z Orthop Unfall. 2013 Feb;151(1):66-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328208. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: The prescription of socket type for above-knee-amputees is based on clinical experience. There are no official guidelines. On the basis of treatment statistics and a patient survey, this study shows the indications and contraindications of a liner system.

Patients and methods: Treatment statistics including data from the medical reports of 183 above-knee-amputees, who were treated in our clinic from 2003 to 2007 were analysed. 32 patients had a system change between liner- and contact-shaft accommodation and were contacted by telephone. The aim was to evaluate satisfaction with the current socket type and thus be able to compare types.

Results: A statistically significant relation in the treatment statistics between the quality of the stump and the socket type can be shown. A mesh graft to cover the stump, extreme volume fluctuation, low activity class and co-morbidities are the main reasons for the use of a liner system. Main reasons for a change to a liner system were the preservation of individual independence, better adhesion and skin problems.

Conclusion: The developed clinical criteria can help physicians decide which socket type is most beneficial for each individual patient.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Amputation Stumps*
  • Amputees / rehabilitation*
  • Artificial Limbs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Data Collection
  • Female
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction / statistics & numerical data*
  • Prevalence
  • Prosthesis Fitting / statistics & numerical data*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult