Differentiating positive and negative self-rated health: results from a cross-sectional study in Estonia

Int J Public Health. 2013 Aug;58(4):555-64. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0445-6. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine possible differences in the correlates of positive and negative self-rated health (SRH).

Methods: Data for 2,127 men and 2,385 women in the 25-74 age group came from the Estonian Health Interview Survey 2006. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to study the association of socio-demographic, physical and psychological health and well-being characteristics with positive (good or very good) and negative (bad or very bad) SRH as compared to fair SRH.

Results: Negative SRH was related to male gender, the presence of chronic illnesses, limitations in daily activities and physical functioning, emotional distress, an external locus of control, and to low satisfaction with life and physical fitness. These indicators (except satisfaction with life) were also related to positive SRH, presenting a mirrored pattern of association. Additionally, positive SRH was related to younger age, an Estonian ethnic identity, and to higher education and income.

Conclusions: Although SRH forms a ill/healthy continuum when physical and psychological health characteristics are considered, the broader spectrum of predictors indicates that positive SRH and negative SRH are two distinct and alternative concepts.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Attitude to Health*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diagnostic Self Evaluation*
  • Estonia
  • Female
  • Forecasting
  • Health Status Indicators*
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Physical Fitness
  • Risk Factors
  • Self Report
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors*