Complications of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Dig Endosc. 2013 Mar:25 Suppl 1:71-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01376.x. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Abstract

Endoscopic resection is now a widely accepted treatment for early gastric cancer, having a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new endoscopic resection method developed in the mid-1990 s that facilitates en-bloc resection even in patients with large or ulcerative lesions difficult to resect using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, compared to EMR, ESD requires a longer procedure time and a higher level of technical expertise, in addition to having a slightly greater risk of complications. Endoscopists must be aware of not only the risk factors for, and incidence of, complications, but also how to effectively treat such complications. Perforation and bleeding are the major complications associated with gastric ESD. The perforation and delayed bleeding rates have been reported to range from 1.2% to 5.2% and 0% to 15.6%, respectively, and can usually be managed with appropriate endoscopic treatment. Immediate bleeding during gastric ESD is quite common and controlling such bleeding, which is primarily achieved by carrying out electrocautery, plays a critical role in the successful completion of ESD.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Dissection / adverse effects*
  • Electrocoagulation
  • Gastric Mucosa / pathology*
  • Gastric Mucosa / surgery*
  • Gastroscopy / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Metastasis / pathology
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnosis
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology*
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage / therapy
  • Reoperation
  • Risk Factors
  • Stomach / injuries
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery*