Dental implants in the medically compromised patient

J Dent. 2013 Mar;41(3):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Abstract

Objective: It has been suggested that some local and systemic factors could be contraindications to dental implant treatment. The objective of this paper was to evaluate whether success and survival rates of dental implants are reduced in the medically compromised patient.

Data/sources: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Scirus and Cochrane databases up to November 8, 2012.

Conclusions: There are very few absolute medical contraindications to dental implant treatment, although a number of conditions may increase the risk of treatment failure or complications. The degree of systemic disease-control may be far more important that the nature of the disorder itself, and individualized medical control should be established prior to implant therapy, since in many of these patients the quality of life and functional benefits from dental implants may outweigh any risks.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Child
  • Chronic Disease
  • Contraindications
  • Dental Care for Children
  • Dental Care for Chronically Ill*
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous*
  • Dental Implants*
  • Diabetes Complications
  • Ectodermal Dysplasia
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa
  • Epilepsy
  • Hemorrhagic Disorders
  • Humans
  • Immunocompromised Host
  • Lichen Planus, Oral
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Osteoradionecrosis
  • Risk

Substances

  • Dental Implants