Sequential tool use in great apes

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052074. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

Abstract

Sequential tool use is defined as using a tool to obtain another non-food object which subsequently itself will serve as a tool to act upon a further (sub)goal. Previous studies have shown that birds and great apes succeed in such tasks. However, the inclusion of a training phase for each of the sequential steps and the low cost associated with retrieving the longest tools limits the scope of the conclusions. The goal of the experiments presented here was, first to replicate a previous study on sequential tool use conducted on New Caledonian crows and, second, extend this work by increasing the cost of retrieving a tool in order to test tool selectivity of apes. In Experiment 1, we presented chimpanzees, orangutans and bonobos with an out-of-reach reward, two tools that were available but too short to reach the food and four out-of-reach tools differing in functionality. Similar to crows, apes spontaneously used up to 3 tools in sequence to get the reward and also showed a strong preference for the longest out-of reach tool independently of the distance of the food. In Experiment 2, we increased the cost of reaching for the longest out-of reach tool. Now apes used up to 5 tools in sequence to get the reward and became more selective in their choice of the longest tool as the costs of its retrieval increased. The findings of the studies presented here contribute to the growing body of comparative research on tool use.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Choice Behavior*
  • Decision Making*
  • Female
  • Food
  • Hominidae
  • Male
  • Problem Solving*
  • Tool Use Behavior*

Grants and funding

Gema Martín-Ordas was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship of the “Programa de Ayuda a la Movilidad del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Micinn)”, Spain. Also parts of the first author’s contributions were supported by the Danish National Research Foundation.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.