The effectiveness of an online support group for members of the community with depression: a randomised controlled trial

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053244. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Abstract

Background: Internet support groups (ISGs) are popular, particularly among people with depression, but there is little high quality evidence concerning their effectiveness.

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an ISG for reducing depressive symptoms among community members when used alone and in combination with an automated Internet-based psychotherapy training program.

Method: Volunteers with elevated psychological distress were identified using a community-based screening postal survey. Participants were randomised to one of four 12-week conditions: depression Internet Support Group (ISG), automated depression Internet Training Program (ITP), combination of the two (ITP+ISG), or a control website with delayed access to e-couch at 6 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-intervention, 6 and 12 months.

Results: There was no change in depressive symptoms relative to control after 3 months of exposure to the ISG. However, both the ISG alone and the combined ISG+ITP group showed significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms at 6 and 12 months follow-up than the control group. The ITP program was effective relative to control at post-intervention but not at 6 months.

Conclusions: ISGs for depression are promising and warrant further empirical investigation.

Trial registration: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN65657330.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Community Networks
  • Depression / therapy*
  • Education / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internet* / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Online Systems*
  • Psychotherapy / methods*
  • Self-Help Groups*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Associated data

  • ISRCTN/ISRCTN65657330

Grants and funding

The trial was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant 471435. KG is supported by NHMRC Fellowship No. 525413 and HC is supported by Fellowship No. 525411. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.