Design and biomechanical properties of a new reconstruction device for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures

Orthopedics. 2012 Dec;35(12):e1785-91. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121120-25.

Abstract

Implants currently used for reconstruction of a burst vertebral body are associated with complications, including subsidence, nonunion, and substantial intraoperative blood loss. A new reconstruction device, the U-Cage (Double Engine Medical Material Ltd, Xiamen, Fujian, China), was designed to minimize complications.Six intact adult cadaver thoracolumbar (T11-L3) spines were collected and scanned by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The stiffness of the burst spine was subsequently compared with its previous intact state during flexion/extension, lateral bending, and rotation, and then subjected to a cyclic test to predict cage subsidence and device loosening. Axial load was applied continuously until failure to test the peak load that the specimen could withstand during the cyclic test. The correlation of bone mineral density and peak load was also analyzed. The instrumented specimens were found to be equivalent to intact bone in all directions (P>.05), with the exception of left rotation (P<.05). All specimens could withstand the cyclic test, and no subsidence or loosening of the device was detected. Average peak load for the instrumented specimens was 4137.5 N, which correlated with the average bone mineral density (r=0.915; P=.011).Thoracolumbar burst fractures instrumented with a U-Cage and anterolateral D-rod fixation achieved a stiffness similar to that of intact spines. This procedure may avoid the subsidence of the cage in vivo and serve as a better option for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Cervical Vertebrae / injuries*
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Spinal Fractures / physiopathology
  • Spinal Fractures / surgery*
  • Spinal Fusion / instrumentation*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed