Effectiveness of joint health and safety committees: a realist review

Am J Ind Med. 2013 Apr;56(4):424-38. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22143. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Abstract

Background: Joint health and safety committees (JHSCs) are widely acknowledged as important to a healthy and safe work environment. However, it is also generally believed that having a JHSC is necessary but not sufficient; the JHSC must be effective.

Methods: A systematic review was undertaken to find empirical studies regarding the effectiveness of JHSCs; realist review methodology was applied to determine context-mechanism-outcome patterns. Experts from across Canada and from various sectors and perspectives including government, employers, and unions, were brought together to inform the synthesis.

Results: Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Mechanisms identified as important determinants of JHSC effectiveness across various jurisdictions include adequate information, education and training; appropriate committee composition; senior management commitment to JHSCs; and especially a clear mandate with a broad scope and corresponding empowerment (through legislation and/or union presence).

Conclusions: Consistent empowerment mechanisms emerge as determinants of successful JHSCs across contexts despite few evidence-based details for best practice implementation. Intervention research is warranted.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Advisory Committees / organization & administration*
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Humans
  • Labor Unions
  • Occupational Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Occupational Health*
  • Occupational Injuries / prevention & control*
  • Power, Psychological
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Workplace / organization & administration*