A multi-center comparison of diagnostic methods for the biochemical evaluation of suspected mitochondrial disorders

Mitochondrion. 2013 Jan;13(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

Abstract

A multicenter comparison of mitochondrial respiratory chain and complex V enzyme activity tests was performed. The average reproducibility of the enzyme assays is 16% in human muscle samples. In a blinded diagnostic accuracy test in patient fibroblasts and SURF1 knock-out mouse muscle, each lab made the correct diagnosis except for two complex I results. We recommend that enzyme activities be evaluated based on ratios, e.g. with complex IV or citrate synthase activity. In spite of large variations in observed enzyme activities, we show that inter-laboratory comparison of patient sample test results is possible by using normalization against a control sample.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adenosine Triphosphatases / metabolism
  • Animals
  • Carrier Proteins / metabolism
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / methods*
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / methods*
  • Electron Transport
  • Humans
  • Laboratory Proficiency Testing
  • Membrane Proteins / metabolism
  • Mice
  • Mitochondria / enzymology
  • Mitochondria / metabolism
  • Mitochondrial Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Mitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPases

Substances

  • Carrier Proteins
  • Membrane Proteins
  • Adenosine Triphosphatases
  • Mitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPases
  • oligomycin sensitivity-conferring protein