Preparing to grasp emotionally laden stimuli

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045235. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Abstract

Background: Contemporary theories of motor control propose that motor planning involves the prediction of the consequences of actions. These predictions include the associated costs as well as the rewarding nature of movements' outcomes. Within the estimation of these costs and rewards would lie the valence, that is, the pleasantness or unpleasantness of a given stimulus with which one is about to interact. The aim of this study was to test if motor preparation encompasses valence.

Methodology/principal findings: The readiness potential, an electrophysiological marker of motor preparation, was recorded before the grasping of pleasant, neutral and unpleasant stimuli. Items used were balanced in weight and placed inside transparent cylinders to prompt a similar grip among trials. Compared with neutral stimuli, the grasping of pleasant stimuli was preceded by a readiness potential of lower amplitude, whereas that of unpleasant stimuli was associated with a readiness potential of higher amplitude.

Conclusions/significance: We show for the first time that the sensorimotor cortex activity preceding the grasping of a stimulus is affected by its valence. Smaller readiness potential amplitudes found for pleasant stimuli could imply in the recruitment of pre-set motor repertoires, whereas higher amplitudes found for unpleasant stimuli would emerge from a discrepancy between the required action and their aversiveness. Our results indicate that the prediction of action outcomes encompasses an estimate of the valence of a stimulus with which one is about to interact.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cerebral Cortex / physiology
  • Electroencephalography
  • Emotions / physiology*
  • Hand Strength / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

Funding was provided by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior/Comitê Francês de Avaliação da Cooperação Universitária e Científica com o Brasil (CAPES/COFECUB) and Rede Instituto Brasileiro de Neurociência (IBN Net). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.