Development of a new optical device and its feasibility in prostate cancer detection

Urol Int. 2012;89(3):290-5. doi: 10.1159/000339966. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

Abstract

Aim: To develop a new optical device (prostate optical device, POD) for assessment of prostate tissue stiffness and evaluate its sensitivity and specificity in prostate cancer detection.

Patients and methods: POD was tested in prostate phantoms and in patients with indications for prostate biopsy. Its sensitivity and specificity were compared to digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS).

Results: POD was able to identify stiffness differences on each prostate phantom. 45 patients were included in the study. Sensitivity of TRUS (40%) was significantly lower to POD (85.7%) and DRE (74.3%) (p = 0.000 and p = 0.003, respectively). There was no statistical difference between POD and DRE (p = 0.221). The combination of POD and DRE showed the highest sensitivity (88.6%), positive predictive value (81.6%), and negative predictive value (42.9%) among all diagnostic tests.

Conclusions: POD identified prostatic stiffness differences with the same sensitivity of DRE performed by an experienced urologist providing an objective indication for prostate biopsy and early prostate cancer detection.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Equipment Design
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Optical Devices
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prostate / pathology
  • Prostatic Hyperplasia / diagnosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Urology / methods*