Guillotine versus dissection tonsillectomy: randomised, controlled trial

J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Nov;126(11):1142-9. doi: 10.1017/S002221511200196X. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Abstract

Objective: This trial aimed to compare the guillotine technique of tonsillectomy with 'cold steel' dissection, the current 'gold standard'.

Design: A single centre, randomised, controlled trial.

Methods: One hundred children aged 3 to 11 years who were listed for bilateral tonsillectomy were recruited. Patients had one tonsil removed by each technique, and were blinded to the side. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, haemostasis requirement and post-operative pain scores were recorded and compared.

Results: Operative time and intra-operative blood loss were both significantly less for the guillotine technique (p < 0.001) and there was a significantly reduced haemostasis requirement (p < 0.001). Pain was also less on the guillotine side (p < 0.001). There were no tonsillar remnants or palatal trauma for either technique. There was no significant difference between techniques in the frequency of secondary haemorrhage.

Conclusion: This study provides level Ib evidence that guillotine tonsillectomy in children with mobile tonsils is an effective and time-efficient procedure which produces less intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain than cold steel dissection.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Blood Loss, Surgical / statistics & numerical data*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Dissection / adverse effects
  • Dissection / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pain, Postoperative / epidemiology*
  • Palatine Tonsil / surgery*
  • Tonsillectomy / adverse effects
  • Tonsillectomy / methods*
  • Tonsillitis / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome