Comparisons of three methods for organic and inorganic carbon in calcareous soils of northwestern China

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044334. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

Abstract

With increasing interest in the carbon cycle on arid land, there is an urgent need to quantify both soil organic carbon (SOC) and inorganic carbon (SIC) thus to assess various methods. Here, we present a study employing three methods for determinations of SOC and SIC in the Yanqi Basin of northwest China. We use an elemental analyzer for both SOC and SIC, the Walkley-Black method for SOC, a modified pressure calcimeter method for SIC, and a simple loss-on-ignition (LOI) procedure for determinations of SOC and SIC. Our analyses show that all three approaches produce consistently low values for SOC (1-14 g kg(-1)) and high values for SIC (8-53 g kg(-1)). The Walkley-Black method provides an accurate estimate of SOC with 100% recovery for most soil samples. The pressure calcimeter method is as accurate as the elemental analysis for measuring SIC. In addition, SOC and SIC can be accurately estimated using a two-step LOI approach, i.e., (1) combustion at 375°C for 17 hours to estimate SOC, and (2) subsequent combustion at 800°C for 12 hours to estimate SIC. There are strong linear relationships for both SOC and SIC between the elemental analysis and LOI method, which demonstrates the capability of the two-step LOI technique for estimating SOC and SIC in this arid region.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Carbon / analysis*
  • Carbonates / chemistry
  • Chemistry Techniques, Analytical / methods*
  • China
  • Electric Conductivity
  • Geography
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Linear Models
  • Organic Chemicals / analysis*
  • Soil / chemistry*

Substances

  • Carbonates
  • Organic Chemicals
  • Soil
  • Carbon

Grants and funding

This study is financially supported by the Program of 100 Talented Young Scientists with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (O972021001)(http://www.cas.cn/ggzy/rcpy/brjh/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.