Presence of crystals is not an evidence of absence of infection

Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;31(2):455.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.020. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

Abstract

Acute monoarthritis is one of the most common rheumatologic presentations. However, it is clinically difficult to distinguish between an inflamed joint due to crystal-induced arthritis and an inflamed joint due to septic arthritis. Arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis are used to differentiate between these 2 conditions. The presence of crystals and positive synovial fluid culture confirm the diagnosis of crystal-induced arthritis and septic arthritis, respectively. Although uncommon, these 2 arthritides can coexist, and presence of crystal does not exclude bacterial arthritis. We reported a case of 85-year-old woman whose synovial fluid contained crystals and was initially diagnosed with crystal-induced arthritis. However, her joint fluid culture subsequently grew Staphylococcus aureus, and she was treated with arthroscopic debridement and antibiotics.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Ankle Joint* / microbiology
  • Ankle Joint* / pathology
  • Arthritis, Infectious / complications
  • Arthritis, Infectious / diagnosis*
  • Chondrocalcinosis / complications
  • Chondrocalcinosis / diagnosis*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Staphylococcal Infections / complications
  • Staphylococcal Infections / diagnosis*
  • Synovial Fluid / chemistry
  • Synovial Fluid / microbiology