Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012 Aug;20(2):143-7. doi: 10.1177/230949901202000201.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the extent of tibial bone covered by the tibial tray in 6 most commonly used total knee arthroplasty designs in order to strike a balance between mediolateral cortical fit and optimal tibial component rotation.

Methods: In 74 men and 27 women aged 17 to 60 (mean, 32) years with suspected soft-tissue injuries, their magnetic resonance images of the knee in full extension were superimposed with scans of the tibial trays of the 6 designs (one asymmetric and 5 symmetric). The tibial coverage by the tray and any posterolateral/posteromedial overhang/underhang were measured.

Results: All 6 tray designs achieved tibial bone coverage of over 80%. Only 28% of all trays achieved optimal posterolateral fit, whereas 49% had posterolateral overhang enough to cause popliteal tendon impingement. Although the asymmetric tray provided highest tibial coverage (88%), its rates of relative and absolute posterolateral and posteromedial overhang were also highest (64%).

Conclusion: The asymmetric tray provided improved tibial coverage at the expense of posterolateral and posteromedial overhang of the tibial tray.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rotation
  • Tibia*
  • Young Adult