Construction of a genetic linkage map and genetic analysis of domestication related traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata)

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041304. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

Abstract

The genetic differences between mungbean and its presumed wild ancestor were analyzed for domestication related traits by QTL mapping. A genetic linkage map of mungbean was constructed using 430 SSR and EST-SSR markers from mungbean and its related species, and all these markers were mapped onto 11 linkage groups spanning a total of 727.6 cM. The present mungbean map is the first map where the number of linkage groups coincided with the haploid chromosome number of mungbean. In total 105 QTLs and genes for 38 domestication related traits were identified. Compared with the situation in other Vigna crops, many linkage groups have played an important role in the domestication of mungbean. In particular the QTLs with high contribution were distributed on seven out of 11 linkage groups. In addition, a large number of QTLs with small contribution were found. The accumulation of many mutations with large and/or small contribution has contributed to the differentiation between wild and cultivated mungbean. The useful QTLs for seed size, pod dehiscence and pod maturity that have not been found in other Asian Vigna species were identified in mungbean, and these QTLs may play the important role as new gene resources for other Asian Vigna species. The results provide the foundation that will be useful for improvement of mungbean and related legumes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chromosome Mapping*
  • Crosses, Genetic
  • Expressed Sequence Tags
  • Fabaceae / genetics*
  • Genetic Linkage*
  • Microsatellite Repeats
  • Phenotype
  • Quantitative Trait Loci
  • Quantitative Trait, Heritable*
  • Seeds / genetics

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research of the Japanese Ministry of the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (No. 18390009). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.