Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of available data

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Aug;22(4):e190-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318257000c.

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility and limitation of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), we performed a systematic literature search and 11 studies were included. SILC was successfully performed in 91.9% participants and conventional instruments were used mostly. Although longer operative time was required for this novel procedure than the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, mean difference was 18.54 minutes (P=0.0001) and a learning curve was noted. There was no significant discrepancy in overall complications and severe complications (P=0.51 and 0.82, respectively). No difference in the length of hospital stay between the 2 groups was detected (P=0.09). No consensus has reached on the postoperative pain score between the 2 techniques. SILC with conventional instruments was a feasible and safe approach. It may be offered as an alternative for cholecystectomy in carefully selected patients.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / methods*
  • Conversion to Open Surgery / statistics & numerical data
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome