Three-field minimally invasive esophagectomy: current results and technique

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):S63-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Abstract

The adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy has increased worldwide since its first description more than 15 years ago. The technique has evolved from a transhiatal to a 3-hole McKeowan approach and, more recently, to a minimally invasive Ivor Lewis approach. We reviewed the technique and results of 3-hole minimally invasive esophagectomy. We favor thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization with the patient in a lateral decubitus position, although other groups have reported this with a prone or robotic approach. Several series have demonstrated low perioperative mortality with minimally invasive esophagectomy. A major advantage compared with esophagectomy with thoracotomy is a lower incidence of respiratory complications, which have been shown to be a significant predictor of mortality in other studies.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Esophagectomy / adverse effects
  • Esophagectomy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Patient Positioning
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome