Doublet versus single cytotoxic agent as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lung. 2012 Oct;190(5):477-85. doi: 10.1007/s00408-012-9399-3. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of doublet versus single third-generation cytotoxic agent as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Several databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), 1-year survival rate (1-year SR), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE). We performed a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials using a fixed-effects model and an additional random-effects model when applicable. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). A subgroup meta-analysis was performed based on chemotherapy regimens.

Results: Ten eligible trials involving 2,510 patients were identified. The intention-to-treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that doublet therapy was superior to single agent in terms of OS (HR = 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.71-1.00, p = 0.053), TTP (HR = 0.76, 95 % CI = 0.60-0.96, p = 0.022), 1-year SR (RR = 1.17, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.35, p = 0.03), and ORR (RR = 1.54, 95 % CI = 1.36-1.73, p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis also favored platinum-based doublet therapy in terms of 1-year SR (RR = 1.40, 95 % CI = 1.09-1.81, p = 0.009) and ORR (RR = 1.64, 95 % CI = 1.38-1.96, p = 0.000). Though gemcitabine-based doublet significantly increased ORR compared with single agent (RR = 1.45, 95 % CI = 1.23-1.71, p = 0.000), it did not translate into an increase in survival benefits. In addition, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity were observed in the doublet combination group. With respect to grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and nonhematologic toxicities such as diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting, equivalent frequencies were found between the two groups.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that doublet therapy was superior to a single third-generation cytotoxic agent for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The optimal dosage and schedule of platinum-based doublet should be investigated in future prospective clinical trials. Gemcitabine-based doublet could be considered for elderly patients who were not suitable for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anemia / chemically induced
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / drug therapy*
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / mortality
  • Deoxycytidine / analogs & derivatives
  • Deoxycytidine / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Gemcitabine
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Lung Neoplasms / mortality
  • Male
  • Models, Biological
  • Neutropenia / chemically induced
  • Platinum Compounds / therapeutic use
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Thrombocytopenia / chemically induced
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Platinum Compounds
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Gemcitabine