Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes

Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):406-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the reporting of race/ethnicity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) Clinic Outcome Reporting System (CORS) publications.

Design: Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology of literature published in PubMed on race/ethnicity that includes data from SART CORS.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patient(s): Not applicable.

Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization cycles reported to SART.

Main outcome measure(s): Any outcomes reported in SART CORS.

Result(s): Seven publications were identified that assessed racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes using SART data. All reported a racial/ethnic disparity. However, more than 35% of cycles were excluded from analysis because of missing race/ethnicity data.

Conclusion(s): Review of current publications of SART data suggests significant racial/ethnic disparities in IVF outcomes. However, the potential for selection bias limits confidence in these findings, given that fewer than 65% of SART reported cycles include race/ethnicity. Our understanding of how race/ethnicity influences ART outcome could be greatly improved if information on race/ethnicity was available for all reported cycles.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Ethnicity / ethnology*
  • Female
  • Healthcare Disparities / ethnology
  • Healthcare Disparities / standards
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Racial Groups / ethnology*
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted* / standards
  • Research Report* / standards
  • Societies, Medical* / standards
  • Treatment Outcome