Deal or no deal: can incentives encourage widespread adoption of intelligent speed adaptation devices?

Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep:48:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

Abstract

Given the burden of injury, economic, environmental and social consequences associated with speeding, reducing road traffic speed remains a major priority. Intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) is a promising but controversial new in-vehicle system that provides drivers with support on the speed-control task. In order to model potential system uptake, this paper explores drivers' preferences for two different types of ISA given a number of alternative fiscal incentives and non-fiscal measures, using a stated preference approach. As would be expected with such a contentious issue, the analysis revealed the presence of significant variations in sensitivities and preferences in the sample. While a non-negligible part of the sample population has such strong opposition to ISA that no reasonable discounts or incentives would lead to them buying or accepting such a system, there is also a large part of the population that, if given the right incentives, would be willing or even keen to equip their vehicle with an ISA device.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acceleration
  • Accident Prevention / economics
  • Accident Prevention / instrumentation*
  • Accidents, Traffic / prevention & control*
  • Adult
  • Artificial Intelligence*
  • Attitude
  • Automobile Driving / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Automobile Driving / psychology*
  • Automobiles* / economics
  • Choice Behavior
  • Consumer Behavior
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Insurance / economics
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Law Enforcement / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Motivation*
  • Taxes
  • United Kingdom