Smallest real difference of 2 instrumental activities of daily living measures in patients with chronic stroke

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1097-100. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the smallest real difference (SRD) values of 2 instrumental activities of daily living measures (the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living [NEADL] and the Frenchay Activities Index [FAI]) in patients with chronic stroke.

Design: Test-retest reliability study.

Setting: Physical rehabilitation units of 5 hospitals.

Participants: Chronic stroke patients (N=52; 37 men, 15 women) who were discharged from the hospital for more than 6 months.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Both measures were administered twice about 2 weeks apart to participants. The SRD was calculated on the basis of standard error of measurement: SRD = 1.96 × √2 × Standard error of measurement. SRD% (the value of SRD divided by total score of a measure) was used to compare measurement errors across both measures. Reproducibility between successive measurements of the measures was investigated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: The SRD (SRD%) values of the NEADL and the FAI were 12.0 (21.1%) and 6.7 (14.9%), respectively. Test-retest reproducibility of both measures was high (ICC: NEADL=.89, FAI=.89).

Conclusions: Because of substantial SRD values of the NEADL and the FAI, prospective users should be cautious in using both measures to detect real change for a single subject.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living*
  • Aged
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cohort Studies
  • Disability Evaluation*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Physical Therapy Modalities / standards*
  • Rehabilitation Centers
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stroke / diagnosis
  • Stroke Rehabilitation*
  • Taiwan
  • Treatment Outcome