Retroperitoneal laparoscopic reconstruction for retrocaval ureter: experience and literature review

J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1147-52. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0076. Epub 2012 May 8.

Abstract

Purpose: We describe surgical techniques and experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloureterostomy in five cases of retrocaval ureter (RU). We also report the laparoscopic approach reconstruction for RU from peer-reviewed publications.

Patients and methods: Five patients with RU underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloureterostomy. Nuclear renography, intravenous urography (IVU), and ultrasonography follow-up was performed postoperatively. Science Citation Index searches were conducted to identify laparoscopic reconstruction for RU outcomes. Studies published after 1994 were included in the analysis.

Results: Operations were completed successfully and without complications in five patients. The mean operative time was 90.2 ± 34.4 minutes. The mean time needed to insert the Double-J stent and reanastomosis was 51.2 ± 11.4 minutes. Blood loss was minimal. Over a follow-up of 12 to 37 months, hydronephrosis was found to decrease substantially. There were 24 peer-reviewed studies covering a total of 62 patients suitable for inclusion in our final analysis. The most common method for reconstruction of the ureter was ureteroureterostomy, followed by pyeloureterostomy and pyelopyelotomy.

Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopy for RU is a safe and effective procedure that should be considered as a first-line treatment for patients with this anatomic anomaly.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anastomosis, Surgical
  • Child
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Retroperitoneal Space / surgery*
  • Ureter / abnormalities*
  • Ureter / diagnostic imaging
  • Ureter / surgery*
  • Urography
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Young Adult