Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites

Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0689-1. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

Abstract

Objective: Clinical data indicate an increased trend in material fracture as reason for failure in composite restorations, questioning whether modern resin-based composites (RBCs) are able to fulfil the rising aesthetical demands and to provide at the same time a sufficient mechanical stability also in larger cavities. Nano-hybrid RBCs are promoted as materials with improved mechanical properties. The aim of this study was to analyse differences in mechanical properties within and between modern flowable and non-flowable nano-hybrid and micro-hybrid RBCs by measuring mechanical properties at macro- and micro-scale.

Methods: Thirty-four RBCs with traditional and new monomer formulation or photo-polymerization initiator technology-15 nano-hybrid, nine micro-hybrid and ten flowable-were therefore considered. Flexural strength, flexural modulus (E(flexural)), indentation modulus, Vickers hardness (HV) and creep were measured after the samples had been stored in water for 24 h at 37°C. Differences within the materials as well as within material categories were statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05) as well as partial eta-square statistics.

Results: The category of micro- and nano-hybrid RBCs performed in all properties superior compared to the flowable RBCs. The former two categories differ significantly only with regard to three parameters, with nano-hybrid RBCs showing higher HV respectively lower E(flexural) and filler weight. The micro-mechanical parameters proved to be more sensitive to differences in filler amount and RBCs type than the macro-mechanical properties.

Clinical relevance: Only few differences were found between nano-hybrid and micro-hybrid RBCs as a material category and thus, from laboratory tests, no clear advantages in the mechanical stability in stress-bearing areas of nano-hybrid RBCs are expected clinically. Similar is valid for materials with new monomer formulation or photo-polymerization initiator technology. However, several of the measured nano-hybrid RBCs showed consistently higher mechanical properties than the mean values of the micro-hybrid RBCs.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Composite Resins / chemistry*
  • Composite Resins / classification
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Elastic Modulus
  • Hardness
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Mechanical Phenomena
  • Methacrylates / chemistry
  • Nanocomposites / chemistry*
  • Photoinitiators, Dental / chemistry
  • Pliability
  • Polymerization
  • Silorane Resins / chemistry
  • Surface Properties
  • Temperature
  • Time Factors
  • Urethane / analogs & derivatives
  • Urethane / chemistry
  • Viscosity
  • Water / chemistry

Substances

  • CeramX
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Materials
  • Estelite sigma
  • Esthet-X
  • Filtek Supreme
  • Gradia
  • Grandio
  • Methacrylates
  • N'Durance composite resin
  • Photoinitiators, Dental
  • Silorane Resins
  • Simile composite resin
  • Tetric EvoCeram
  • Venus (composite resin)
  • diurethane dimethacrylate
  • premise composite resin
  • silorane composite resin
  • Water
  • Urethane