Protection of pigs against genital Chlamydia trachomatis challenge by parenteral or mucosal DNA immunization

Vaccine. 2012 Apr 16;30(18):2869-81. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.044. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

Abstract

The current study evaluates combined aerosol-vaginal delivery of a MOMP-based Chlamydia trachomatis (serovar E) DNA vaccine in a pig genital challenge model. Most non-replicating antigens are rather poor mucosal immunogens in comparison to replicating antigens. Therefore, a mucosal administered DNA vaccine, which actually mimics a live vaccine, could be promising. Protection was promoted by plasmids encoding the porcine granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (pcDNA3.1zeo::GM-CSF), the Escherichia coli thermo-labile enterotoxin (LT) subunit A (plasmid PJV2004::LTa) and subunit B (plasmid PJV2005::LTb). Mucosal C. trachomatis DNA vaccination induced significant protection against genital C. trachomatis challenge although the infection could not be eradicated. Intradermal immunization was significantly less efficient in protecting experimentally infected pigs. Protection was correlated with efficient T cell priming and significantly higher serum IgA titers following primo vaccination.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / administration & dosage
  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / genetics
  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Administration, Intravaginal
  • Animals
  • Bacterial Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Bacterial Vaccines / immunology*
  • Chlamydia trachomatis / genetics
  • Chlamydia trachomatis / immunology*
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Female
  • Immunity, Mucosal*
  • Immunization / methods*
  • Lymphogranuloma Venereum / immunology
  • Lymphogranuloma Venereum / prevention & control*
  • Plasmids / administration & dosage
  • Swine
  • Vaccines, DNA / administration & dosage
  • Vaccines, DNA / immunology*

Substances

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic
  • Bacterial Vaccines
  • Vaccines, DNA