Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean sections: the effects on postoperative pain perception

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jul;286(1):75-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2265-y. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative pain perception and analgesia requirements in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) using general versus spinal anesthesia.

Study design: A prospective, observational study of patients undergoing elective CS during 2009 under either general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative pain intensity and analgesia requirements were evaluated for up to 48 h after surgery.

Results: A total of 153 women were enrolled; 77 received general and 76 received regional anesthesia. Postoperative meperidine requirements in the first 24 h were significantly higher in the general anesthesia group. Pain scores were mostly comparable between the groups. Nevertheless, lower pain scores were graded after 8 h in the general versus the spinal anesthesia and this reversed at 48 h.

Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia is comparable to general anesthesia in terms of post-operative pain control. In choosing the type of anesthesia in CS, other factors such as the urgency and potential maternal and fetal hazards should be taken into account.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analgesics, Opioid / therapeutic use
  • Anesthesia, General*
  • Anesthesia, Obstetrical*
  • Anesthesia, Spinal*
  • Cesarean Section* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Meperidine / therapeutic use
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain Perception*
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology
  • Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control*
  • Pregnancy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Meperidine