Rt-PCR increases detection of submicroscopic peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer and has prognostic significance

J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 May;16(5):889-96; discussion 896. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1845-2. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

Abstract

Background: Positive peritoneal cytology confers the same prognosis as clinical stage IV disease in gastric cancer. Conventional cytology examination, however, has low sensitivity. We hypothesize that real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) may have increased sensitivity and provide more accurate staging information.

Methods: From February 2007 to April 2009, peritoneal lavage samples were collected prospectively from 156 patients with biopsy-proven gastric cancer undergoing staging laparoscopy. These washings were analyzed by both Papanicolaou staining and RT-PCR for the tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

Results: Visible peritoneal disease was seen at laparoscopy in 38 patients (LAP+, 24%). Cytology was positive (CYT+) in 23 patients, while RT-PCR was positive (PCR+) in 30. The sensitivity of CYT for the detection of visible disease was 61% compared to 79% for PCR (P = 0.02). No visible peritoneal disease was seen at laparoscopy (LAP-) in 118 (76%) patients. Eight (7%) were CYT+, while 28 (24%) were PCR+. Predictors of PCR positivity included advanced-stage disease (T3-4 vs. T1-2 tumors) and poor pathologic features such as vascular or perineural invasion. Long-term follow-up demonstrated a worse survival of LAP-CYT-PCR+ (P = 0.0003) and LAP-CYT+PCR+ (P = 0.0004) compared to LAP-CYT-PCR- patients. There was no significant difference in survival between CYT-PCR+ and CYT+PCR+ patients. PCR positivity also predicted a higher likelihood of disease recurrence after resection. An R0 resection was performed in 85 LAP- patients (54%): only 1 (1%) was CYT+, while 13 (15%) were PCR+. Of this group, PCR+ demonstrated a worse survival than PCR- patients (P = 0.02). Further analysis showed that, in R0 resection, stage III/IV, CYT- subgroup, PCR+ was associated with a trend towards worse survival (P = 0.09) compared to PCR- patients.

Conclusion: RT-PCR for CEA increases the detection of subclinical peritoneal disease and is more sensitive than cytology. Predictors of positive PCR included advanced-stage disease, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion. PCR positivity was associated with increased disease recurrence and decreased survival. Further follow-up is required to determine if PCR positivity alone is an independent predictor of poor survival in gastric cancer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biopsy, Needle
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cytodiagnosis / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging / methods*
  • Peritoneal Lavage
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Preoperative Care / methods
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • RNA, Messenger / analysis
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Stomach Neoplasms / mortality
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology
  • Stomach Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • RNA, Messenger