A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):58-61. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318247d966.

Abstract

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) and Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy (LH) are standard for hemorrhoidal disease treatment, but the surgical principle is different. This randomized clinical trial compared the 2 methods. We included 98 patients with grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease: 46 patients treated by SH and 52 patients by LH. Incidence of complications, recurrence, postoperative pain, wound healing time, and time off everyday activity were observed. The follow-up period was 24 months. We found that LH has a significantly shorter wound healing time. The recurrence rate and the overall postoperative complication rate was higher after SH but not significantly (recurrence LH vs. SH: 1.9% vs. 11.1%; complications LH vs. SH: 13.5% vs. 23.9%). Postoperative pain level, analgesic consumption, and time off everyday activity were practically the same in both groups. Both procedures can be used to treat grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease with the same efficacy, but analysis of recurrence after SH is necessary.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Anus Diseases / diagnosis
  • Anus Diseases / etiology
  • Constriction, Pathologic / diagnosis
  • Constriction, Pathologic / etiology
  • Digital Rectal Examination
  • Hemorrhoids / physiopathology
  • Hemorrhoids / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Ligation
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology
  • Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology*
  • Recurrence
  • Surgical Stapling / methods*
  • Suture Techniques
  • Wound Healing / physiology
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Analgesics