Systemic inflammatory response after single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic approach

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):21-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea5c.

Abstract

Purpose: The extent of surgical trauma is reflected by systemic inflammatory response (SIR). The aim of this study was to assess SIR after single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus the standard laparoscopic approach.

Materials and methods: Twenty pigs were assigned into 4 groups: SILS (group SILS), laparoscopy using 4 trocars (group LAPSC), pneumoperitoneum (group PNE), or a sham-operation (group Sham) group. Blood samples were taken at 0, 1, 3, 6, 24, and 48 hours and 1 week postoperation to measure tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, and C-reactive protein serum levels.

Results: No significant changes were noted among groups for each time point studied regarding tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, and IL-18. C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower (P<0.05) in group PNE compared with the other groups at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week.

Conclusions: There is no difference in SIR after SILS versus the standard laparoscopic approach.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • C-Reactive Protein / metabolism
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Interleukin-18 / metabolism
  • Interleukin-6 / metabolism
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects*
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Random Allocation
  • Sus scrofa
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / etiology*
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / metabolism

Substances

  • Interleukin-18
  • Interleukin-6
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
  • C-Reactive Protein